Decision Velocity use case
After a reorganization
Check whether authority changed with the organization chart.
The problem
A new chart does not guarantee a new decision path.
A reorganization changes people and reporting lines, but authority may not move with them. The same decisions can continue to wait for the same people, sometimes with additional review steps. The chart records the intended structure. A diagnostic records how one participant reports the decision path in practice.
Begin with one decision
Examine one defined decision path.
In about ten minutes, one leader answers structured questions about a specific decision. The run produces a Decision Velocity score and result band. Your invited Workspace saves the Executive Report, which describes the conditions reported in that scope.
One person’s result describes that run. It is not an organization-wide finding.
What a campaign adds
Compare the same decision across the reorganized unit.
Invite six to twelve people who participate in or oversee the same decision. Depth Synthesis summarizes eligible runs, including the median, spread, and whether participant groups report authority moving with the new structure.
What comes after
Make a change, then repeat the same measure.
Run the same version for the same decision and participant group in about 90 days. A score difference means the reported responses changed. It does not, by itself, explain why they changed or prove that an intervention caused the difference. Repeat measurement is available through a subscription and is not required to begin.