Decision Velocity use case
After an acquisition
Compare how a critical decision moves on each side of the transaction.
The problem
Integration plans need an operating view.
Approval routes, handoffs, and informal decision rights can remain different after a transaction closes. An integration plan may set one timetable, while the two organizations continue to move decisions through different operating structures.
Begin with one decision
Examine one defined decision path.
In about ten minutes, one leader answers structured questions about a specific decision. The run produces a Decision Velocity score and result band. Your invited Workspace saves the Executive Report, which describes the conditions reported in that scope.
One person’s result describes that run. It is not an organization-wide finding.
What a campaign adds
Compare equivalent organizational groups on both sides.
Invite participants from comparable teams, departments, or divisions in each organization. Depth Synthesis summarizes eligible runs, showing where participants report similar or different decision paths. Those differences can direct further review during integration. They do not predict the outcome.
What comes after
Make a change, then repeat the same measure.
Run the same version for the same decision and participant group in about 90 days. A score difference means the reported responses changed. It does not, by itself, explain why they changed or prove that an intervention caused the difference. Repeat measurement is available through a subscription and is not required to begin.